AssetBuilder Inc, - Registered Invesment Advisor - Simple Investing Smart Future
in

Registered Investment Advisor

Scott Burns' Articles -- Recent and Archived

New Rules for Retirement Spending?

How much can you spend in retirement?

Nine years ago I took the legendary Peter Lynch to task for giving bad advice on that question. He had told readers of Worth magazine they could invest 100 percent of their money in common stocks and safely withdraw an initial 7 percent a year, adjusting for inflation. Working with Ken Bingham, a friend and stockbroker at UBS, we showed that such withdrawals had a major chance of leaving you dead broke.

We weren't alone in our concern about portfolio withdrawal rates. Financial planner William P. Bengen had addressed the subject in the Journal of Financial Planning early in 1994, demonstrating that the maximum safe initial withdrawal rate from a retirement portfolio was about 4 percent. A few years later, three researchers at Trinity University tested different portfolios and found that initial withdrawal rates of 4 to 5 percent were about the best you could do.

Needless to say, no one likes to hear this.

We all want to be told they can have a starting withdrawal rate of 6, 7, 8, or 9 percent from our savings, adjust upward for inflation each year, and never run out of money. Many readers have suggested that you can withdraw more than four percent if you are flexible, e.g. not increasing your withdrawals when values are down, etc.

Well, some new research suggests you can take more than 4 percent.

In the October Journal of Financial Planning Certified Financial Planner Jonathan T. Guyton tests a variety of spending rules during one of the worst periods for retirement imaginable—1973 through 2003. The period includes two major meltdowns and early years of heavy-duty inflation. Searching for a withdrawal rate that would be safe for a period of 40 years, he found withdrawals limited to 4.7 percent with an 80 percent equity portfolio and no rules. Apply two simple rules, however, and your initial withdrawal rate can be 6.2 percent.

  Here are the rules.

Rule Number one: There is no increase in withdrawals after any year with a negative total return and there is no "catch-up" for any missed increase in any subsequent year.

Rule Number two: Regardless of the inflation rate, the maximum annual income increase is limited to 6 percent and you cannot "catch-up" in later years.

Retirees can apply those rules and safely increase their initial retirement spending by one-third!

Alas, before you start lining up for the spending parade there is something you need to know. Other research, published in the September/October issue of the Financial Analysts Journal, will rain on your parade.

Starting with the idea that future portfolio returns are influenced by valuation levels when you start, researcher Robert Arnott examines returns of typical portfolios and finds that real returns have averaged about 4.2 percent in the post war period. A portion of that real return, however, came from rising valuation levels.

When valuation level changes are stripped out, the average real return on a 60/40-stock/bond portfolio has been only 3.4 percent since World War II. Since valuation levels are currently high and we can't count on them rising still further, Mr. Arnott believes pensions and endowments may be heading for trouble.

"Sustainable return and real return, not counting changes in valuation levels or yields, have averaged, respectively, 3.3 percent and 1.9 percent," Mr. Arnott writes. "This return is nowhere near the 5 percent spending required of foundations, nor does it approach the 5-6 percent spending rules that prevail for most endowments."

Since foundations, endowments, and retirees are trying to do essentially the same thing--- maintain constant spending power over a long period of time--- it's very likely Mr. Guyton's rules give a dangerous sense of safety.

Bottom line:   Withdraw more than five percent a year at your peril.

Sunday, October 1, 1995: Dangerous Advice from Peter Lynch

Tuesday, July 27, 1999: When $2 Million Isn't Enough

The Spender's Portfolio: Columns on Retirement Spending

Columns on Portfolio Survival

Comments

No Comments

About scottb

Scott Burns has covered the changing world of personal finance and investments for nearly 40 years. Today, he ranks as one of the five most widely read personal finance writers in the country. Scott began his career as a newspaper columnist at the Boston Herald in 1977 where he was also the financial editor. Nationally syndicated in 1981 and now distributed by Universal Press, the column appears in newspapers from Boston to Seattle. In 1985 he joined the staff of the Dallas Morning News where his column quickly became one of the most widely read features in the paper. He left the Dallas Morning News in 2006 to become one of the founders of AssetBuilder and its Chief Investment Strategist. Burns is a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1962). He has written four books, including "The Coming Generational Storm" (MIT Press, 2004) coauthored with economist Laurence J. Kotlikoff. His fourth book, also coauthored with Kotlikoff, will be published this spring by Simon & Schuster. "Spend Til' the End" uses consumption smoothing to demonstrate the errors of conventional financial planning. His business experience includes working as a staffer for a major consulting company and service as a director and audit chairman of a NASDAQ listed manufacturing company. He and his wife divide their time between Dallas and Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Copyright © 2007 - 2008, AssetBuilder Inc - DFA Advisor. All Rights Reserved.