AssetBuilder Inc, - Registered Invesment Advisor - Simple Investing Smart Future
in

Registered Investment Advisor

Scott Burns' Articles -- Recent and Archived

Future Tax Bills: Why the young should save with a Roth

Q. I am 30 and will be getting married this August. Combined, my fiancée and I have $115,000 in Roth IRAs, $53,000 in our 403(b) accounts, $37,000 in taxable accounts, and $10,000 in a variable annuity that we plan not to touch for 40 years.

In "The Coming Generational Storm" you recommend that younger investors should pay taxes up front. You suggest contributing as much as possible to Roth IRAs and taxable accounts, while suspending any unmatched contributions to 401(k) or 403(b) plans. At present, our combined modified AGI is just under the $150,000 limit for full Roth IRA contributions, so we will each continue to contribute to those to the max. If we continue to contribute the maximum to our plans at work, our taxable income (after deductions, exemptions and contributions) is right around the top of the 25 percent tax bracket--- $123,700 for 2006.

My question: When a Roth 403(b) option becomes available through our employers next year, should we contribute to it and forgo our efforts to keep our income within the 25 percent tax bracket?

---B.W., by email from Dallas

  

A. That's exactly what you should do. There are two reasons young workers should pay taxes now rather than later. First, few expect that future income tax rates will be lower than current tax rates. All other things equal, that makes paying taxes now a better deal--- unless your employer is matching. Second, the taxation of Social Security benefits is a minor issue for retirees today, but it will be a major issue for young people when they retire.

The formula for the taxation of Social Security benefits is not indexed to inflation. Fixed at an income measure of $32,000 in 1983, a retired couple with $32,000 of benefits today can have only $16,000 of other income before some of their benefits become subject to taxation. Have inflation double their benefits to $64,000 and every dime of income from other sources will trigger taxation of Social Security benefits.

At 3 percent inflation, benefits will double in only 24 years. At 4 percent inflation, benefits will double in only 18 years. As a consequence, even if Federal income tax rates remain unchanged, young workers will face very high marginal tax rates on their tax deferred savings.

If you want to know who not to vote for, this onerous tax was introduced by Republicans. Later, it was increased by Democrats. So it is a truly bipartisan hosing of the young. They made program benefits safe for those who vote today, leaving a major problem for young people.

  

Q. Every January I receive a letter from the administrator for my company 401(k) plan. It states that the plan must conduct compliance testing with respect to "highly compensated" employees--- those earning more than $95,000 a year in 2005, and $100,000 in 2006. Apparently, IRS rules state that the average percentage of salary contributed by non-highly compensated employees must be compared to highly compensated employees. If the difference is too great, a refund check is issued to the highly compensated employees.

In previous years we have "passed" this test. This year we did not. I received a check for nearly $4,000. So I have to change my 2005 income taxes and contribute less to my retirement this year.

Does this happen often? Why would the IRS allow $14,000 maximum contribution, and then take it away because of this test? What can my company do to prevent this from happening in future years?

---F.M., by email from Dallas

  

A. This happens frequently, particularly at companies where the average worker earns relatively little and there is significant employee turnover. It's particularly galling for workers who earn just enough to be considered "highly compensated" because the truly highly compensated--- those earning $200,000 a year and more--- will be able to max their contributions. Why? Their $14,000 contribution will be a smaller percentage of their income.

You can do two things. If you are married, if your income is under $150,000 and if your spouse is not covered by a plan at work, you can open an IRA account and invest the refunded amount there. This year you can put $4,000 in an IRA account, whatever your age and those over 50 can contribute an additional $1,000. If you open your IRA account at a low cost mutual fund company there is a good chance your annual expenses will be lower than those incurred by your company 401(k) plan, particularly if you work at a small company.

The second thing you can do is encourage your employer to provide automatic enrollment and a non-elective employer contribution of 3 percent, or more, of payroll. This will cost real money but it will avoid top-heavy testing.

Comments

 

HappilyRetired said:

Amen. AND having just gone through the application last week for my Medicare in six months. The Part B means testing had a nasty surprise. The means test was not done against current income. The means test backs up two years to a point when I was still working. Result is a much higher starting point for the Part B premiums. So the inflation starts from a higher point.
June 14, 2008 5:58 PM

About scottb

Scott Burns has covered the changing world of personal finance and investments for nearly 40 years. Today, he ranks as one of the five most widely read personal finance writers in the country. Scott began his career as a newspaper columnist at the Boston Herald in 1977 where he was also the financial editor. Nationally syndicated in 1981 and now distributed by Universal Press, the column appears in newspapers from Boston to Seattle. In 1985 he joined the staff of the Dallas Morning News where his column quickly became one of the most widely read features in the paper. He left the Dallas Morning News in 2006 to become one of the founders of AssetBuilder and its Chief Investment Strategist. Burns is a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1962). He has written four books, including "The Coming Generational Storm" (MIT Press, 2004) coauthored with economist Laurence J. Kotlikoff. His fourth book, also coauthored with Kotlikoff, will be published this spring by Simon & Schuster. "Spend Til' the End" uses consumption smoothing to demonstrate the errors of conventional financial planning. His business experience includes working as a staffer for a major consulting company and service as a director and audit chairman of a NASDAQ listed manufacturing company. He and his wife divide their time between Dallas and Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Copyright © 2007 - 2008, AssetBuilder Inc - DFA Advisor. All Rights Reserved.