AssetBuilder Inc, - Registered Invesment Advisor - Simple Investing Smart Future
in

Registered Investment Advisor

Scott Burns' Articles -- Recent and Archived

Is It Time to Junk the SUV?

Chevy SuburbanBy Scott Burns

I have a confession to make. Do you remember the parsimonious Prius I’ve written about, the one that gets 45 mpg?

Well, it isn’t the only car in the Burns family. Our other vehicle isn’t a Zamboni. And you won’t find it in our garage, because it won’t fit.

It’s a 2002 Chevrolet Suburban.

That’s a Big SUV. To be specific, it’s a Z-71 with four-wheel drive and a towing package.This is one tough vehicle. It will take on any rock pile in Big Bend National Park. It will run on Interstate 40 until they shut the road down. Last winter, on a drive from Santa Fe to Dallas, we passed more than a dozen 18 wheelers trashed on the side of the road. We lost count of the passenger cars crumpled against guard railings, overturned, and generally battered. But the Z-71 plowed on through. It’s the George Patton of SUVs. It’s also big enough to haul our Airstream, if time ever permits.

Like most Suburban buyers, we didn’t buy it because we love seeing big numbers on a gas pump. We bought it for the same reason we bought all the Jeeps that preceded it--- to haul stuff.

It does this at about 13 miles per gallon. So with regular gasoline around $4 a gallon, it costs about 30 cents a mile to keep it moving. The Prius, on the other hand, costs about 9 cents a mile.

The difference is major. Let the gas tank get close to empty, and the Suburban can’t be refilled because most pumps shut down at $75. Small wonder that sales of new SUVs have plummeted and some car dealers are refusing to accept SUVs in trade--- they already have plenty, thank you.

And that opens an interesting question. If an SUV is essentially worthless as a trade, is there a gas price that will compel you to simply junk it?

The answer is yes. But not yet.

Here’s the basic math. If your SUV is worthless, it will be worth junking when the cost per mile of feeding it gasoline is greater than the cost per mile for fuel plus the cost per mile of the depreciation on a new vehicle. (The Junking Moment will be higher if you also consider financing costs and insurance, but we’re going to keep it simple here.)

Let’s also assume that a new car will lose about 80 percent of its value in the first 100,000 miles. That means a new $25,000 vehicle will lose $20,000 in 100,000 miles and cost about 20 cents a mile for depreciation. A $30,000 vehicle will cost about 24 cents a mile for depreciation, and a $40,000 vehicle will cost about 32 cents a mile for depreciation. Depreciation is the largest single cost, by far, of owning a car.

To throw the SUV away, we’d need to find a combination of new car depreciation and gas cost per mile that is less than the 30 cents it costs to run the Suburban.

Can it be done?

Not quite. The table below shows the fuel cost per mile for different gasoline prices and mileage.

Running on Empty

This table shows the cost per mile driven for different prices of gasoline and different fuel efficiencies. Measure the difference between two mileage costs at the same cost of gasoline and you have the amount you can pay for depreciation. Pay more for depreciation and you’ll pay more to drive, not less.
Cost per Gallon 13 mpg 20 mpg 25 mpg 40 mpg
$4 31 cents/mi 20 cents/mi 16 cents/mi 10 cents/mi
$5 38 25 20 12.5
$6 46 30 24 15

Subtract the more efficient cost from the less efficient cost and you have the amount you can spend on depreciation. At $4 a gallon, for instance, the difference between my 13 mpg Suburban and a 40 mpg replacement is about 21 cents a mile. So the replacement vehicle would need to cost about $25,000. That isn’t too likely.

If gas goes to $6 a gallon, however, the Suburban would cost 46 cents a mile, 31 cents more than a 40 mpg replacement vehicle. That vehicle could cost nearly $40,000. (A more sophisticated version of this, based on current car values, is available on www.edmunds.com. Look for its “gas-guzzler” calculator.)

So what’s the answer today?

For the Burns family, it’s simple. Don’t buy a new vehicle. Drive less. Drive the gas-sipper as much as possible, the guzzler as little as possible. Use the SUV for what it’s made for, not for trips to the grocery store.

On the web:

The Edmunds car exchange calculator

earlier Prius columns

CNN on dropping SUV sales

Published Jul 18 2008, 03:00 PM by admin
Filed under:

Comments

 

Spork said:

Forgive me here, as my in depth financial knowledge is well below "couch potato". It might be better described as "seat of the pants." But my gut tells me there is more to it than this. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong... but let me attempt to explain. I realize the numbers you give are simplified... and I am all for keeping it simple. But let me temporarily make this a little more complicated. I think the cost of the new car (whether it is a hybrid or not) is more than just the depreciation. There is also the opportunity costs (if that is the right term) one gives up when one takes $30,000 of investment money and puts it towards a depreciating asset. And more likely than not, for most people it is not just the lack of interest on $30k, but it is an interest payment on a car note or a lease payment. It also seems like there needs to be some financial bonus figured in for driving the zero value car. If I can buy a junker 1981 pickup for $25, earn interest on $30,000 and never make a car payment (other than at my friendly local auto parts store) I think I have really accomplished some serious savings. It really doesn't matter that it gets 15mpg if I can stretch the actual purchase of another car for 3 or 4 years. And if that next car is another used car, I move even further ahead. Add to this the cost of "new tech" when it comes to a hybrid. Don't misunderstand me here, I think they are cool. But the early adopters not only pay a premium when they buy new technology, they also pay a premium with increased problems. That is not to say it will happen to every hybrid, but it is likely to happen to a good chunk of them. I suspect this means either they need to be depreciated faster or that they need more repairs. In short, the constant media attention that it's time to "sell your SUV" and "buy a hybrid" is, to me, a signal of the exact opposite. In other words, the zero value SUV is a bargain basement buy. Am I missing something or is there something to this?
July 19, 2008 9:52 AM
 

FL-Man said:

If you junk it, how will you haul your Airstream?
July 20, 2008 7:18 AM
 

jvrounds said:

I have a similar story. Three years ago I bought a hybrid, an Excape, not a Prius. It only gets 25 to 30 mpg. That is a good 10 mpg better than comparable sized vehicles, AND it is not a roller skate and you ride in an upright position, much like a chair (important to me). This may be a sleeper among the hybrids, in my opinion. When the family was growing, we always had a 12 passenger van. We have one again, not that we really need it. I bought it at about one year of age with 20,000 miles at about 50 cents on the dollar. We have been to Florida and back with three people and much "stuff," including a chest of drawers. Recently, we took ten people and "stuff" to Larado on our way to Mexico. At the first gas stop, the van took exactly $1.50 more gas than a Ford Expedition. Even at $5 a gallon gas, these big vehicles simple do certain things more cheaply than you can do them any other way. I will admit that I would probably be better off simply renting the van when necessary, however! Jack
July 20, 2008 11:49 AM
 

Tree said:

When you're six foot nine inches tall and 325 pounds, you are not going to drive a car designed by some design team that thinks a Mini Cooper is the right size for all of us. Some of us are always going to be in large four wheel drive vehicles (because of a desire to go to the mountains in the winter) or because of our size. I pay more for suits, shirts, shoes and so on, so why shouldn't I pay more for gas for a vehicle that fits me? It's just the "cost of doing business!" But, at the end of the year when I compare my costs with those of friends or family that will share with me or with the mileage gurus at some of the internet sites, the difference is not enough to have worried about. If you happen to be in a SUV or pickup or similar large vehicle, just keep on going. Could you get all your people and stuff in any other vehicle? Could you get up the canyon or up the mountain or have the assurance of a lot of steel surrounding you in the event of a wreck with a smaller car? If and when gas is $6 or $10, I won't like it, but my friends and family that are in itty-bitty cars aren't going to like it either. Besides, they need me. "Boy, if we think we have it rough, think about old Tree in his huge four wheel drive pickup!" They can gloat and feel better by the moment. So, I'm performing a needed public service. Thanks for the facts and figures. All of us need some reality checks at times like these. Tree
July 21, 2008 3:32 PM
 

scottb said:

When push comes to shove, the biggest expense for owning a vehicle (car, truck) is depreciation. Fuel comes in around third. Raise the cost of gas and it may come to rival depreciation, but depreciation will always be an elephant in the room. My expectation is that SUVs purchased for dull-witted reasons are going to be sold dirt cheap. But SUVs purchased as logical transportation solutions will continue, hissing from the energy rightious notwithstanding. That said, I would not be surprised if a lot of soccer moms now driving Suburbans, Yukons, and Expeditions will so rediscover the charm of Mini-vans because they haul as much with generally greater fuel efficiency. Scott
July 24, 2008 5:18 PM
Copyright © 2007 - 2008, AssetBuilder Inc - DFA Advisor. All Rights Reserved.